How a Fintech Team Cut Critical Findings in 60 Days
A case study on using Sentinel and Surge to validate risk, guide fixes, and prove progress across microservices.
Understanding Continuous Security for Fintech
Modern software changes faster than traditional review cycles. A useful security program has to answer four questions quickly: what is exploitable, who owns the fix, did the fix work, and what proof can we show later?
Continuous Security for Fintech matters because security work often stalls between detection and closure. Continuous validation keeps the work close to the code, the owners, and the evidence buyers or auditors will ask for.
The best security programs do not stop at finding risk. They make closure easy to prove.
Implementation Notes
Start with one narrow workflow. Pick the application, control, or service where unresolved findings create the most drag, then wire validation and proof around that path.
// Before: 47 critical vulnerabilities
// After 60 days with Sentinel:
// - 4 remaining (in remediation)
// - 90% reduction
// - Mean time to detect: 2.3 hours (was 14 days)
const metrics = await sentinel.getReport("fintech-client");
console.log(metrics.criticalCount); // 4
The goal is not more dashboards. The goal is a shorter path from signal to fix to evidence.