Scanners
Scanners create lists. Engineers still need proof
An alert still needs exploit context, ownership, priority, and a fix path.
Security that keeps up with shipping
Find real risks. Fix them. Prove they are closed
Automate Security turns pentest findings, scanner noise, and customer evidence requests into one clear workflow: validate the exploit, prepare the fix, replay the test, and keep the proof.
Validated risk
Show engineers the path that actually breaks.PR over PDF
Move findings toward reviewable fixes.Proof on demand
Keep the exploit, fix, and retest together. sentinel / dashboard / production LIVE
01 / Crawl
02 / Pentest
03 / Fix
04 / Proof
3 require review 2 fixes ready API.PROD
V-1041 Tenant report export bypass PR open
+42/-18 V-1040 Stored input execution path Drafting
... V-1038 Cookie flag regression Retested
proof V-1037 Role boundary mismatch Owner found
auth For teams that need security work to end in closed findings, not longer backlogs.
Application security Engineering owners Customer evidence Release readiness
The gap
Modern teams ship every week. Security still waits for windows
The hard part is no longer finding another issue. It is proving which issues matter, getting the fix to the right owner, and showing the risk stayed closed after the next release.
sample release history Code changes faster than security can retest
Code changes 60
Validation windows 4
Manual pentests
Pentests end with a report. Your product keeps changing
By the time findings are triaged, patched, and retested, the app may be different.
The real gap
The useful outcome is closure
Automate Security keeps validation, remediation, retest, and proof in one chain.
The promise
Stop selling security work as a report. Deliver a closed loop
A finding is useful only when someone can understand it, fix it, retest it, and defend the result. That is the unit we build around.
How it works
The pentest loop, rebuilt for every release
Expose real risk, help the owner fix it, replay the test, and keep the evidence. Same job. Faster loop. Better handoff.
Step 01 / Crawl
Start with the surface attackers can reach
Sentinel begins with the live application. It discovers routes, API shapes, auth boundaries, and dependency risk so the test scope reflects what is actually running.
Fresh
scope for each release
Live
surface over old reports
Owner
context before fixes
Proof artifacts
Proof your engineers, customers, and auditors can follow
Every confirmed issue carries its story with it: what broke, why it mattered, what changed, and how the fix was verified.
Get a sample walkthroughExploit transcript
The route, request, auth state, and business impact behind the confirmed issue.
Fix plan
Code context, owner notes, test coverage, and the next action for engineering.
Retest result
The original exploit replayed against the fix so closure is not assumed.
Evidence packet
Control mapping, timestamped proof, and a summary ready for customers or auditors.
Product suite
One loop for app risk, resilience, exposure, and evidence
Use the entry point you need now. Keep the work connected as your security program grows.
Sentinel
AI Penetration Testing + Remediation
Test live applications, confirm exploitable findings, and send engineering a fix path they can review. Explore SentinelSurge
Load Testing + Resilience Validation
Stress critical services with realistic traffic and find bottlenecks before launch day finds them for you. Explore SurgeBeacon
Network Monitoring + Threat Signals
Track exposed assets, host findings, and hostile probing signals without stitching scans and spreadsheets together. Explore BeaconResolve
AI Security Intelligence
Unify findings, prioritize by business risk, and coordinate the evidence teams need to prove progress. Explore ResolveBacklog Cost Snapshot
Estimate the engineering cost of security work that waits for triage, fixes, and retests.
Estimated annual backlog cost: $829,920
Potential recovered value at 85% reduction: $705,432
Comparison
Compare tools by what happens after the alert
The question is not just what found the issue. The question is whether the issue was fixed, retested, and easy to prove later.
| Capability | Automate Security | Manual pentest | Legacy scanner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finding quality | Validated exploit path | Point-in-time assessment | Pattern alert |
| Remediation | Fix path with review context | Written guidance | Ticket or export |
| Retesting | Original path replayed | Separate follow-up | Often manual |
| Evidence | Living proof chain | Static report | Scan output |
From the field
Security work that changes the conversation
"Automate Security helped us find critical vulnerabilities and drastically reduce the time to resolve them through automated workflows."
"They helped us validate our blocks under real-world stress and accelerated our SOC 2 compliance."
"We cut vulnerability detection time while keeping deployment velocity up. The team can focus on strategic security instead of constant firefighting."
Get started
Bring a finding, scanner queue, or pentest report. Leave with a clearer path to closure
We will map where validation, remediation, retest, or evidence breaks today and show what Automate Security would automate first.
Book the workflow review